INSTRUMEN HOTS MATEMATIKA BAGI MAHASISWA PGSD

Authors

  • Syafri Ahmad State University of Padang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/

Keywords:

Instruments, HOTS, mathematics, PGSD

Abstract

The background of this research is that no standard instrument can measure the ability of HOTS PGSD students in lectures in high-class mathematics education. This study aims to develop HOTS instruments that are valid, effective and practical. This research is development research. The results of this study were 1) produced valid devices based on expert judgment, 2) HOTS instruments produced were also effective in terms of increasing the HOTS category of PGSD students from the low category up to the medium category, and 3) HOTS instruments categorized as very practical both from faculties of lecturers and students. This research implies that this instrument can be used as a standard measurement tool in knowing the ability of HOTS PGSD students.

References

Bintarawati, D. 2012. The Accuracy of Concordance Method. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(2), p.107–117.

Brookhart, S. M. 2010. How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.

Dewi, N. W. D. P., I Gusti P. S., dan I Made A. 2014. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Scientific Berorientasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Penalaran Siswa. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Matematika, 3(3), p.1–12.

Harisman, Y. 2014. Validitas dan Praktikalitas Modul untuk Materi Fungsi Pembangkit pada Perkuliahan Matematika Diskrit di STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat. AdMathEdu, 4(2), p.207–214.

Hendri, Sherlyane, dan Ary Kiswanto Kenedi. 2018. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 8(2), p.10–24.

Hendryadi. 2017. Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2(2), p.167–178.

Heong, Y. M., et al. 2011. The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social and Humanity, 1(2), p.121–125.

Kamulich, B. B. 2004. Data Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research. Journal of Research in Education, 14(1), p.96–113.

Kenedi, Ary Kiswanto, dan Yullys Helsa. 2017. Literasi Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), p.165–174.

Kenedi, Ary Kiswanto, dkk. 2018. Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Numeracy, 5(2), p.226–234.

Kenedi, Ary Kiswanto, et al. 2018. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Alquran di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), p.29–36.

Kenedi, Ary Kiswanto. 2018. Desain Instrumen Higher Order Thinking pada Mata Kuliah Dasar-Dasar Matematika di Jurusan PGSD. Ar-Riayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), p.67–80.

Kimberlin, L. C., & Almut, G. W. 2008. Validity and Reliability of Measurement Instruments Used in Research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(23), p.2276–2280.

Mansur, Yullys Helsa, dan Ary Kiswanto Kenedi. 2017. Al-Qur’an Based Learning Strategy in Teaching Mathematics at Primary Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 168, p.304–306.

Muijs, D. 2011. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Munandar, Utami. 2012. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

North Carolina State University. 2014. Higher Order Skills in Critical and Creative Thinking. Quality Enhancement Plan. Carolina: NCSU.

Rosnawati. 2009. Enam Tahapan Aktivitas dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendayagunakan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. Makalah Seminar Nasional Revitalisasi MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA. Yogyakarta: UNY.

Rowe, F. 2014. What Literature Review Is Not: Diversity, Boundaries and Recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), p.241–255.

S. Ahmad et al. 2017. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943, 012053.

Suherman, Erman. 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: JICA UPI.

Published

2018-11-26

Issue

Section

Original research

Similar Articles

1-10 of 232

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.