PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN UNTUK PENDIDIKAN GURU SEKOLAH DASAR UNIVERSITAS KUNINGAN

Authors

  • Heru Purnomo Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia Author
  • Isnaini Wulandari Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v3i6.7878

Keywords:

evaluation of learning, teaching materials, primary teacher education

Abstract

Learning Evaluation is one of the compulsory subjects that must be taken by students at PGSD FKIP Kuningan University in order to obtain assessment and evaluation skills. However, there is no teaching evaluation material for PGSD that explicitly discusses the elementary school learning evaluation process. The purpose of this study is to develop instructional evaluation teaching materials on PGSD learning evaluation courses which are expected to equip students to be applied in primary schools when they become teachers. This research method is a research and development study by taking the object of research at the Kuningan University PGSD students (UNIKU). The results of the validation of learning evaluation material experts obtained results with a total score of 74 of the 20 learning indicators assessed with a range of scores 1-5 for the assessment of development products, so that a score of 3.7 from all assessment indicators in the learning evaluation instrument can be said with GOOD category. The results of student responses to the feasibility of developing teaching materials obtained by 90.27% of students on the response Very good and good. Based on the results obtained from the response to the readability of the product development, it was obtained that the response of students was 93.65% in the Very Good and Good categories. Based on the categorization of the gain score analysis in the Hake calculation table, the value of 0.59 is categorized as Medium. Then it can be concluded that the Learning evaluation teaching materials for Kuningan University PGSD students can be declared eligible for use

References

Arifin, Z. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Borg, L.E., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Devi, P.K., et al. (2009). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran untuk guru SMP. Bandung: PPPPTK IPA.

Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 1–26.

Jahanian, R. (2012). Educational evaluation: Functions and applications in educational contexts. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 1(2), 12–20.

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik: Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nulhaqim, S.A., et al. (2016). Peranan perguruan tinggi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia untuk menghadapi ASEAN Community 2015–33: Studi kasus Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Padjadjaran, Institut Teknologi Bandung. Social Work Jurna, 6(2), 22–27.

Prastowo, A. (2014). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Ratnawulan, & Rusdiana. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Sajadi, M. (2013). Formative evaluation as efficient strategy for learning mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research Journal, 1(1), 13.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Material development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2019-11-12

Issue

Section

Original research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1003

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.