ANALISIS VALIDASI LEMBAR KERJA PESERTA DIDIK BERBASIS REALISTIC MATHEMATIC EDUCATION

Bakri; Agustan S; Idawati

doi:10.33578/pjr.v6i5.8882

Authors

Bakri Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia Author
Agustan S Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia Author
Idawati Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v6i5.8882

Keywords:

students’ worksheet, validation, realistic mathematics education

Abstract

This article analyzes the validity of realistic mathematics education-based students’ worksheet. The research design used in this article is Research and Development (R&D) with a 4D development model, which is to define, design, development, and disseminate. The research subject involved 23 students from class IV. The analysis process involved three validators that consisted of two expert validators and one validator practitioner. To analyze the feasibility of students’ worksheets based on realistic mathematics education, it was used questionnaire. Based on the validity analysis, based on data instrument tested by expert and practitioner tests either in terms of design or material, it showed that students’ worksheets based on Realistic Mathematics Education were assessed with an average score of 4.3. Thus, it could be concluded that the students’ worksheets based on Realistic Mathematics Education were valid to use in learning.

References

Arisetyawan, A., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., & Rahmat, C. (2014). Study of ethnomathematics: A lesson from the Baduy culture. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(10), 1–8.

De Lange. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 49–97). Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.

Fannie, R. D., & Rohati, R. (2014). Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa (LKS) berbasis POE (predict, observe, explain) pada materi program linear kelas XII SMA. Sainmatika: Jurnal Sains dan Matematika, 8(1), 96–109.

Fauzan, A., Slettenhaar, D., & Plomp, T. (2002). Traditional mathematics education vs. realistic mathematics education.

Heruman. (2012). Model pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ibrahim, et al. (2012). Pembelajaran matematika: Teori dan aplikasinya. SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Prastowo, A. (2014). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Sapta, A., Hamid, A., & Syahputra, E. (2018). Assistance of parents in learning at home. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114, 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012020

Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran: Berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian dan pengembangan (research and development). Alfabeta.

Suherman, E. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. JICA.

Supardi. (2012). Pengaruh pembelajaran matematika realistik terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari motivasi belajar. Jurnal FMIPA Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta.

Susanto, A. (2013). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Syahri, A. A. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan pendekatan realistik setting kooperatif terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematika siswa kelas VIII. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 216–235.

Wagimun. (2015). Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa (LKS) dengan pendekatan PMRI pada pokok bahasan kubus dan balok kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo, 3(2).

Wijaya, A. (2012). Pendidikan matematika realistik: Suatu alternatif pendekatan pembelajaran matematika. Graha Ilmu.