IMPROVING TEACHER MOTIVATION THROUGH THE USE OF TEACHING TOOLS WITH DIRECT LEARNING

Sudarmiatun Sudarmiatun

Abstract


This study aims to determine whether using teaching aids in direct learning can increase the teaching motivation of teachers at SMP Negeri 1 Bangko, Rokan Hilir Regency. This research is only limited to increasing teacher motivation in teaching by using teaching aids at SMP Negeri 1 Bangko, Rokan Hilir Regency. The research subjects consisted of 23 teachers. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the aspect of the principal's activity as a facilitator is achieved with a score of 25 or with a percentage of 63 from all aspects of the assessment or by 63% of all activities are achieved. Then in the second cycle, the score obtained was 38 or with a percentage of 95% of all aspects achieved. In the aspect of teacher activity as a participant in this study, in the first cycle, the score obtained from the implementation of the direction by the principal got a score of 52 or with a percentage of achievement of 28%. Then in cycle II, the participation rate was 76% higher than cycle I and with an implementation score of 80. In terms of teacher motivation during the implementation of the direction from cycle I to cycle II, teacher motivation in using teaching aids tended to increase. In the first cycle, the percentage of achievement was 64% in the good category, then the second cycle got a percentage of 82% or in the very good category.


Keywords


motivation, teaching aids, direct learning

References


Aydin, A., Savier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 805-811.

Earley, P., & Fletcher-Campbell, F. (1989). Managing school departments and faculties: towards better practice. Educational Research, 31(2), 98-112.

Greenwood, J.Y. (2011). African American teacher leaders: Selections, supports, barriers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auburn University, Alabama.

Hallinger, P. (2007). Leadership for Learning: Reflections on the practices of instructional and transformational leadership. Paper presented at Seminar at East Asia University.

Hamalik, O. (2003). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Ibrahim, M. S., Ghavifekr, S., Ling, S., Siraj, S., & Azeez, M. I. K. (2014). Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’ commitment towards organizational, teaching profesion and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., 15, 177-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9308-3

Loo, S-C., & Ling, Y-L. (2018). Transformational leadership as a predictor towards job satisfaction among form six teachers in Sarawak. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i1.11087.

Leithwood, K. A., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529561.

Ling, Y. L., Abdullah, K. A. G., & Ismail, F. (2015). Feedback environment and job motivation among middle leaders of educational organizations. Journal of Education and Training, 3(1), 90-105.

Leonard. (2015). Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya. Jurnal Formatif, 5(3), 192-201.

Muhlison. (2014). GURU PROFESIONAL (Sebuah Karakteristik Guru Ideal Dalam Pendidikan Islam). Jurnal Darul ‘ Ilmi, 02 (02), 46 – 60.

Makhmudah, S. (2016). Upaya Memperbaiki Kualitas Guru Dengan Memaksimalkan Terpenuhinya Kompetensi Kepribadian Dan Profesionalisme Guru. Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(1), 80 – 103.

Nurhaidah. (2014). Pengembangankompetensi Guru Dalammewujudkansumber Daya Manusia Yang Berkualitas di Sekolah Dasar. JURNAL PESONA DASAR, 2(3), 13-26.

Prasetyo, B., & Jannah, L. M. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sumarni, Babo, R., & Madani, M. (2020). Principal Supervision in Increasing Elementary School Teacher’s Performance. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 9(3), 359-366. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v9i1.7857.

Slameto. (2016). Supervisi Pendidikan Oleh Pengawas Sekolah. Kelola Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3 (2), 192-206.

Suryani, C. (2015). Implementasi Supervisi Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Proses Pembelajaran di MIN Sukadamai Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 16 (1), 23- 42.

Wardani dkk. 2004. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta. Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.

Yusuf, A. R., & Mukhadis, A. (2018). Model Pengembangan Profesionalitas Guru Sesuai Tuntutan Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi Di Indonesia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9 (2), 130- 139.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i5.8121

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)

Secretariat
Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Gedung B1, FKIP Universitas Riau
Kampus Bina Widya Km. 12,5 Simpang Baru Panam
Pekanbaru Riau Indonesia 28293
e-mail : pajar@ejournal.unri.ac.id