SOCIAL MEDIA INTERDISCIPLINARY IN MULTIMODALITY OF INTERACTIVE ARTS AND CULTURE LEARNING FOR MILLENIALS

Yasinda Widya Fahmi, Djuli Djatiprambudi, Warih Handayaningrum

Abstract


This study aimed to explore the problems in learning interactive art and culture at Junior High School level which was categorized as the millennial generation. The focus of this study laid in the interdisciplinary aspect of social media in multimodality of learning arts and culture. In order to reveal the opportunities and challenges of the use of social media in its development as a medium in interactive art and culture learning, as well as the students’ responses about it. This study used qualitative-analytic method. Data were obtained from observation conducted from January to June 2020 at junior high schools in Surabaya, East Java. The results showed that the learning involvement experienced by students had complexity and multimodality, including collaborative work, observing, and evaluating each other's work, and involvement in finding, identifying, and exploring trends related to delivery in social media as a medium for art and culture learning. This implied that this learning involvement was able to motivate students to be more actively involved in learning with a sense of joy; positioning artwork with others on social media; increasing the contextual and conceptual understanding in the learning materials and applying it as a process of actualizing aesthetic skills; and improving critical thinking and problem-solving skills.


Keywords


interdisciplinary; social media; multimodality; interactive art and culture learning; millenials

References


Akcaoglu, M., & Bowman, N. D. (2016). Using instructor-led Facebook groups to enhance students’ perceptions of course content. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.029

Albers, P. (2006). Imagining the possibilities in multimodal curriculum design. English Education, 38(2), 75–101. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40173215%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2014). Research Based Character Education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260082

Blankenship, M. (2011). How social media can and should impact higher education. Education Digest, 76(7), 39–42.

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan.

Bourelle, T., Bourelle, A., & Rankins-Robertson, S. (2015). Teaching with Instructional Assistants: Enhancing Student Learning in Online Classes. Computers and Composition, 37, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.007

Bown, O., & Ferguson, S. (2018). Understanding media multiplicities. Entertainment Computing, 25(October 2017), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.11.001

Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3 SE-Original Research Articles). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11284

Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2014). The Internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12007

Choi, H., & Piro, J. M. (2009). Expanding arts education in a digital age. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.3.27-34

Colman, A. (2018). Net.art and Net.pedagogy : Introducing Internet Art to the Digital Art Curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 46(Technology Issue), 61–73.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_2

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edit). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332(6031), 862 LP – 864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

Dussel, I., & Priem, K. (2017). The visual in histories of education: A reappraisal. Paedagogica Historica, 53(6), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1392582

Fachrurrofi, F. (2019). Tradisi Babanyo di Kabupaten Bandung Barat untuk Bahan Pembelajaran di SMA. Lokabasa-Journal of Language Studies, Literature, and Culture Regions and His Teachings, 10(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v10i1

Frois, J. P. (2010). Lacan in Art Education. Visual Arts Research, 36(2), 1–14.

Gao, S., & Wang, C. ming. (2019). Crisis of the human and the responsibilities of art/education. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 20(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2019.1577586

Gehlbach, R. D. (1990). Art education: Issues in curriculum and research. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019007019

Gomis-Porqueras, P., & Rodrigues-Neto, J. A. (2018). Teaching technologies, attendance, learning and the optimal level of access to online materials. Economic Modelling, 73(May 2017), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.009

Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. Journal of Academic Librarianship, October 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163

Grossman, J. (2017). Adaptation in Visual Culture. In Adaptation in Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58580-2

Hamilton, L. A., Suda, K. J., Heidel, R. E., McDonough, S. L. K., Hunt, M. E., & Franks, A. S. (2020). The role of online learning in pharmacy education: A nationwide survey of student pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12, 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.026

Harton, H. C., Richardson, D. S., Barreras, R. E., Rockloff, M. J., & Latanã©, B. (2002). Focused Interactive Learning: A Tool for Active Class Discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2901_03

Hawkesworth, C. J., Cawood, P. A., Kemp, A. I. S., Storey, C. D., & Dhuime, B. (2009). A Matter of Preservation. Science, 323(5910), 49–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168549

Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–1232.

Johnson, G. M. (2014). The ecology of interactive learning environments: Situating traditional theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.649768

Johnston-Goodstar, K., Richards-Schuster, K., & Sethi, J. K. (2014). Exploring Critical Youth Media Practice: Connections and Contributions for Social Work. Social Work (United States), 59(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu041

Kearns, A. J. (2019). The ethical demand in teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.004

Kim, B., Williams, R., & Dattilo, J. (2002). Students’ perception of interactive learning modules. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782361

Knežević, S., & Kovačević, B. (2011). Interactive learning and students’ competences in teaching literature. Metodički Obzori, 6(13), 83–92.

Komalasari, K. (2010). Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Refika Aditama.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.

Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001

Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a Malaysian university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110.

Lin, T.-B., Chen, V., & Chai, C. S. (Eds.). (2015). New Media and Learning in the 21st Century; A Social-Cultural Perspektive. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-326-2

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Ninth edit). Pearson.

Malla, H. A. B. (2017). Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Multikultural Humanistik dalam Membentuk Budaya Toleransi Peserta Didik Di SMA Negeri Model Madani Palu, Sulawesi Tengah. Inferensi, 11(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v11i1.163-186

McClure, M., Tarr, P., Thompson, C. M., & Eckhoff, A. (2017). Defining quality in visual art education for young children: Building on the position statement of the early childhood art educators. Arts Education Policy Review, 118(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2016.1245167

Mignonneau, L., & Sommerer, C. (2005). Designing emotional, metaphoric, natural and intuitive interfaces for interactive art, edutainment and mobile communications. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), 29(6), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2005.09.001

Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., Mcdonald, T., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (Eds.). (2016). Education and Young People. In How the World Changed Social Media (pp. 70–84). UCL Press.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. Routledge.

Mumford, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service language teachers reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course. Computers and Education, 144(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103706

Patelli, P. (2017). A field is to play. Enacting mental images of the soundscape. Emotion, Space and Society, 25, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2016.11.002

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144(March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Reveley, J. (2013). The Exploitative Web: Misuses of Marx in Critical Social Media Studies. Science and Society, 77(4), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2013.77.4.512

Riska, P. A. (2010). The impact of smart board technology on growth in mathematics achievement of gifted learners. Liberty University.

Rudolph, A. L., Lamine, B., Joyce, M., Vignolles, H., & Consiglio, D. (2014). Introduction of interactive learning into French university physics classrooms. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1).

Sajnani, N., Mayor, C., & Tillberg-webb, H. (2020). Aesthetic presence: The role of the arts in the education of creative arts therapists in the classroom and online. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 69(February). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2020.101668

Sampurno, M. B. T., & Camelia, I. A. (2020). Art and Fun Digital Learning for Children with Special Needs: A Case Study on Applying Art as a Learning Technology. 380(SoSHEC), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-19.2019.38

Sandfort, J. R. (2016). Using Technology to Support Interactive Learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002250

Shkedi, A. (2019). Introduction to Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Springer International Publishing.

Son, J., Sun, J., & Lee, J. (2019). Interactive learning through social media for large size classes in the clothing and textile curriculum. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1534002

Strycker, J. (2020). K-12 art teacher technology use and preparation. Heliyon, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04358

Sudarsana, I. K., Nakayanti, A. R., Sapta, A., Haimah, Satria, E., Saddhono, K., Achmad Daengs, G. S., Putut, E., Helda, T., & Mursalin, M. (2019). Technology Application in Education and Learning Process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1363(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1363/1/012061

Sugiarta, A. N. (2007). Pengembangan Model Pengelolaan Program Pembela-jaran Kolaboratif Untuk Kemandirian Anak Jalanan Di Rumah Singgah (Studi Terfokus di Rumah Singgak Kota Bekasi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Syahid, A. (2003). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matakuliah Rancangan Pembelajaran Dengan Menerapkan Model Elaborasi. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2008). Mixed Methodology Across Disciplines. Journal Of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 1–5.

Tusiime, W. E., Johannesen, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2020). Teaching art and design in a digital age: challenges facing Ugandan teacher educators. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1786439

Ulusman, L., & Bayburtlu, C. (2012). Paradigm for Art Education; Creation Story of Jewels, Theme, Design, Artwork, 3D. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.160

Utami, V. M., & Nugraheni, T. (2019). Penerapan Model Treffinger Berbasis Lingkungan dalam Pembelajaran Seni Tari untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Kreatif Siswa. Gondang: Jurnal Seni Dan Budaya, 3(2), 79–85.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. University of Western Ontario.

Van Manen, M. (1995). On the epistemology of reflective practice. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 35–50.

Willis, J. (2007). The neuroscience of joyful education. Educational Leadership, 64, 1–4.

Xia, X. (2020). Learning behavior mining and decision recommendation based on association rules in interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799028




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i1.8257

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)

Secretariat
Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Gedung B1, FKIP Universitas Riau
Kampus Bina Widya Km. 12,5 Simpang Baru Panam
Pekanbaru Riau Indonesia 28293
e-mail : pajar@ejournal.unri.ac.id