ANALYZING MATHEMATICAL LITERACY ABILITIES IN TERMS OF COGNITIVE STYLE OF SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS: A CASE STUDY AT SD INPRES NIPA-NIPA
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the Mathematical literacy skills of Grade VI students of SD Inpres Nipa-Nipa, in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles, based on the six levels of Mathematical literacy. This research was a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were two grade IV students, one student with a reflective style and another student with an impulsive style. The data collection began by giving a cognitive style test and an initial Mathematics test. Then, a Mathematical literacy test was also administered to determine the level of students’ literacy. After that, an interview was conducted to obtain more accurate data. The results showed that (1) the reflective student took a long time and was very circumspect in answering the Mathematical literacy test questions, so that the results were more accurate. The reflective student was able to answer the questions with clear procedures sequentially and was able to interpret and use representations based on information of the questions, so that it could take the right strategy to answer the question. These results revealed that the students were at the third level of mathematical literacy ability, (2) the impulsive student needed shorter time and was less careful in answering a Mathematical literacy test so that the results were less accurate. The results showed that the impulsive student could answer the question with an identified context and the relevant information with a clear question was available. In addition, the impulsive student could identify information obtained from the question and when he was given a stimulus. Thus, the impulsive student possessed the first-level of Mathematical literacy skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (BAHASA INDONESIA)References
Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., dan Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi :Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Membaca. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Aprilia, N.C., Sunardi, dan Trapsilasiwi, D. (2015). “Proses Berpikir Siswa Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika di Kelas VII SMPN 11 Jember”. Jurnal Edukasi. Vol. 2, No. 3, Hal 31-37.
Ayuningtyas, N. (2017). “Profil Literasi Matematis Konten Change and Relationship Siswa Kelas X Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer”. Jurnal Edukasi. Vol. 3, No. 1, Hal 99-109.
BSNP. (2006). Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: BSNP.
Desmita. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Fadiana, M. (2016). “ Perbedaan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita antara Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif”. Journal of Research and AdVances in Mathematics Education. Vol. 1, No. 1, Hal 79-89.
Fathani, A.H. (2016). “Pengembangan Literasi Matematika Sekolah dalam Perspektif Multiple Intelligences”. Edusains. Vol. 4, No. 2, Hal 136-150.
Ghony, M.D., dan Almanshur, F. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jogjakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media.
Ghufron, N., dan Risnawita, R. (2014). Gaya Belajar : Kajian Teoritik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Hasanah, U., Wardono, W., dan Kartono, K. (2016). Keefektifan Pembelajaran MURDER Berpendekatan PMRI dengan Asesmen Kinerja Pada Pencapaian Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Serupa PISA. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5 No. 2)
Isrok’atun, dan Rosmala, A. (2018). Moodel-Model Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kagan, J. (1965). ImpulsiVe and ReflectiVeChildren: Significance of Conceptual Tempo.Dalam Krumboltz, J.D (Eds.) Learning and theEducational Process. Chicogo.Rand Mc Nally & Company.
Kemendikbud. (2016). “Peringkat dan Capaian PISA” dalam https://www.kemdikbud.go.id. Diakses Minggu, 13 Januari 2018.
Kenny, Robert F. (2007). Digital NarratiVe as a ChangeAgent to Teach Reading to Media-Centric Students.International Jurnal of Social Sciences. Vol. 2,No. 3.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulidi, A. (2016). “Pengertian Literasi dan Perkembangannya” dalam http://www.kanalinfo.web.id. Diakses Minggu,12 Mei 2019.
Mulyati, T. (2017). “Kemampuan Pemahaman Membaca, Berpikir Kritis dan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah SQ RQ CQ Model Integratif dengan Literatur Anak”. Disertasi Bandung: UPI. (tidak diterbitkan).
Mulyono, A. (2012). Anak Berkesulitan Belajar: Teori, Diagnosis, dan Remediasinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Nasution, S. (2010). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Nisa, R. (2016). “Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Kemampuan Matematika”. Jurnal Apotema. Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal 66-76.
Nurdianasari, H. (2015). “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran PMRI”. Semarang: UNNES. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan).
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assesment and Analytical Framework. Kanada: OECD.
Ojose, B. (2011). “Mathematics Literacy :Are We Able tp Put the Mathematics We Learn into EVeryday Use ?. Journal of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4 No. 1).
OVan, Waluya S.B., dan Nugroho S.E. (2018). “Analysis Mathematical Literacy Skills in Terms of the Students’ Metacognition on PISA-CPAS Model”. Journal International Conference on Mathematics, Sciensce and Education.
Priyatni, E.T., Hamidah, S.C., dan Adi, P. (2017). Pembelajaran Reflektif : Model Pembelajaran Reflektif yang Responsif Teknologi. Tangerang: Tira Smart.
Putra, N. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahman, A. (2000). Al-Qur’an Sumber Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2005). CognitiVeProcesses in the Refl ectiVe-ImpulsiVe CognitiVeStyle. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. Vol. 166, No. 4, Hal. 451 – 463.
Setiawan, H., Dafik, dan Diah, N. 2014. “Soal Matematika dalam PISA Kaitannya dengan Literasi Matematika dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi”. Jurnal Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika : UniVersitas Jember.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syawahid, M., dan Putrawangsa, S. (2017). “Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar”. Jurnal Tadris Matematika. Vol. 10, No. 2, Hal 222-240.
Ulya, H. (2015). “Hubungan Gaya Kognitif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa”. Vol. 1, No. 2.
Warli. (2010). “Kreativtas Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. Jember. Kadikma. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal 110 – 127.
Warli. (2013). “Kreativitas Siswa SMP yang bergaya Kognitif Reflektif atau Impulsif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.Vol. 20, No. 2, Hal 190 – 201.
Zairozie, A.Z. (2016). “Fungsi Kognitif Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Ditinjau Dari Gender”. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. Madura: Universitas Madura.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i4.8304
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)
Secretariat
Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Gedung B1, FKIP Universitas Riau
Kampus Bina Widya Km. 12,5 Simpang Baru Panam
Pekanbaru Riau Indonesia 28293
e-mail : pajar@ejournal.unri.ac.id