EFL Students’ Perceptions of Google Docs Feedback in Folktale Translation Revision: A Narrative Inquiry

Authors

  • Hemalia Putri Johar Manik Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia Author
  • Ellisa Indriyani Putri Handayani Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v10i4.1497

Keywords:

google docs feedback, student perceptions, translation revision

Abstract

Feedback plays an essential role in helping students improve translation quality, particularly in digitally mediated learning environments. Although previous studies have widely examined digital feedback in academic writing, limited research has explored how EFL students perceive and use feedback in Google Docs when revising culturally rich texts, such as folktale translations. Addressing this gap, this study investigates EFL undergraduate students’ perceptions of Google Docs feedback in folktale translation revision through a narrative inquiry approach. The study involved three undergraduate students enrolled in a translation course at a state university in Central Java, Indonesia. Data were collected through narrative frames, semi-structured interviews, and artifact documentation, and analyzed using thematic narrative analysis. The findings reveal that students perceive Google Docs feedback as an essential support for improving translation quality, particularly in lexical choices, clarification of meaning, and culturally appropriate translation decisions. The study also indicates that students respond to feedback cognitively, affectively, and conatively in different ways depending on the clarity of the feedback, emotional readiness, and level of participation in collaborative revision. In addition, students encountered several challenges, including difficulties understanding indirect feedback, selecting culturally equivalent expressions, managing workload and time constraints, and dealing with technical issues in online collaboration. This study contributes to the growing discussion on digital feedback literacy in translation learning by demonstrating how students interpret and apply feedback during translation revision in collaborative digital environments.

References

Abdelaal. (2020). Lexical and Semantic Problems in Translation. Palgrave Macmillan.

Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157

Alsahil, A. (2024). Exploring students’ perceptions and affordances of Google docs-supported collaborative writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2326030

Ardelia Arum Estiningtyas. (2024). EFL Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Peer Feedback Using Google Docs in Article Writing Class (Vol. 36, Issue 11). Sebelas Maret University.

Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. Routledge.

Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. ELT Journal, 69(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu076

Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Home Tutor Cognitions and the Nature of Tutor Learner Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_13

Barua, J., Subramanian, S., Yin, K., & Suhr, A. (2024). Using Language Models to Disambiguate Lexical Choices in Translation. EMNLP 2024 - 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 4837–4848.

Boud, C. &. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Ć, D. J. (2000). Connotative aspect of meaning: Establishing the latent dimensions. 1–2.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT An Empirical Study of the Learning of Linguistic Generalizations. 357–386.

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002

Creswell, J. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publication.

D. Jean Clandinin, F. M. C. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. WILEY.

Fathimatuzahro, M., & Rizkiyah, F. (2025). AI-driven feedback in EFL s tudents ’ writing : enhance their skills ? 12(1), 637–657.

Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/josc.2018.10.1.02

Handayani, F., & Amelia, M. (2021). Google Docs For Collaborative Essay Writing Practices During Covid-19 University Restrictions: EFL Students’ Perceptions. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i1.4504

Kamila Ridha Amalia. (2023). Pre-Service Teacher’s Engagement in Online Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Article Writing: An Autobiographical Narrative Inquiry [Sebelas Maret University]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/98428/PRE-SERVICE-TEACHERS-ENGAGEMENT-IN-ONLINE-WRITTEN-CORRECTIVE-FEEDBACK-DURING-EFL-ARTICLE-WRITING-COURSE-An-Autobiographical-Narrative-Inquiry

Kasa Rullah Adha, T., Julina, & Erwani, I. (2024). Revision as Part of Translation Process: A Case Study of Mandarin-Indonesian Translation by Chinese Language Students at Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1874–1886. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.13

Kvale. (1996). Challenges to Theoretical Psychology. Captus Press.

Leonita Dian Nugraha. (2023). Exploring The Potential of Google Docs in Facilitating Peer Feedback in An EFL Academic Writing Course: An Autobiography Narrative Inquiry of Pre-Service English Teacher’s Perspective (Vol. 11, Issue 1) [Universitas Sebelas Maret]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/98418/EXPLORING-THE-POTENTIAL-OF-GOOGLE-DOCS-IN-FACILITATING-PEER-FEEDBACK-IN-AN-EFL-ACADEMIC-WRITING-COURSE-An-Autobiography-Narrative-Inquiry-of-Pre-Service-English-Teachers-Perspective

Li, Y., & Li, J. (2024). Applying Descriptivist Norms to Folklore Translation. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), p86. https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v8n1p86

Lwin, S. M., & Marlina, R. (2018). Using folktales as a way to operationalise the paradigm of teaching English as an international language. Asian Englishes, 20(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1440279

Maria Christmastuti Suseno. (2021). Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Teaching Writing (A Case Study at English Education Department of State University in Central Java in the Academic Year of 2019/2020) [Sebelas Maret University]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/82613/Direct-Written-Corrective-Feedback-on-Teaching-Writing-A-Case-Study-at-English-Education-Department-of-State-University-in-Central-Java-in-the-Academic-Year-of-20192020

Mitchell, J. (2021). Affective representation and affective attitudes. December 2018, 3519–3546.

Neri, C. (2021). Translating Folklore: the Myth of Baba Jaga in Afanasev’s Fairy Tales. Translation Studies: Theory and Practice, 1(2 (2)), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.46991/tstp/2021.1.2.016

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501.

Polikarpov, A. M., & Latysheva, O. E. (2023). Translation of Folklore Texts As a Means of Preserving the Nenets Language: an Integrative Approach. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 22(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.3.11

Putri, B. G., Suryati, N., Ivone, F. M., & Hayati, N. (2025). The role of AI in academic writing : Unveiling strategies among EFL students. 12(2), 774–792.

Ramli, R. (2019). Lexical Distortion: a Study on Indonesian-English Translation. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v51.2019.a2

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing : The Art Of Hearing Data Description. SAGE Publications. Inc, 288. https://www.google.com/search?q=Qualitative+Interviewing+%3A+The+Art+Of+Hearing+Data+Description+%3A+Title+%3A+Qualitative+Interviewing+%3A+The+Art+of+Hearing+Data&rlz=1C1BNSD_enLK959LK959&sxsrf=APq-WBsX9LHK_FWnNhY8Gh2lo9xKUaxc1Q%3A1646130394231&ei=2vQdYt

Walgito B. (2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (Vol. 6, Issue August).

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist.

Xu, S., Su, Y., & Liu, K. (2024). Integrating AI for Enhanced Feedback in Translation Revision : A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Engagement.

Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., & Lin, Z. (2020). Written Corrective Feedback Strategies in English-Chinese Translation Classrooms. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00456-2

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles