EVALUATION PROGRAM APPROACH IN EDUCATION

Ira Rahmayuni Jusar; Ambiyar; Ishak Aziz

doi:10.33578/pjr.v7i1.9095

Authors

Ira Rahmayuni Jusar Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, Indonesia Author
Ambiyar Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia Author
Ishak Aziz Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i1.9095

Keywords:

approach models, evaluation program, education

Abstract

This paper describes the evaluation program approach in education. This approach is carried out to evaluate the student’s achievement level in learning. This activity needs to be conducted to help teachers thoroughly so that inputs and processes in learning can be contained in the learning process. The use of method is applied based on a literature review through meta-analysis derived from the results of reviewing journals regarding the implementation of the evaluation program approach in learning that has the same topic in this paper, analyzed, and compared to the review results, which are described in good language. The research result indicates eight approach models in the evaluation of educational programs, which are the CIPP model, Provus model, Stake model, Kirkpatrick model, Brinkerhoff model, Congruence model, Illuminative model, and Logical model. The CIPP model is an approach that teachers often use because it includes context, input, process, and outcome evaluation. The results of applying this approach model can be carried out thoroughly so that it can be applied to every learning subject.

References

Agustina, N. Q., & Mukhtaruddin, F. (2019). The CIPP Model-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) Program at Language Center. English Language Teaching Educational Journal (ELTEJ), 2(1).

Ahmad, S. (2015). Kompetensi Dosen UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dalam Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Telaah atas Konstruksi Soal Perspectif Higher Education. Salam: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar’i, II(1), 189–208.

Argaheni, B. N. (2020). Sistemik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring saat Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Dan Aplikasinya: PLACENTUM, 8(2), 99–108.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development , 5(1), 189–205.

Dahono, C. A. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran berbasis Proyek pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Menggunakan Model CIPP di MTS Negeri Jember III. Universitas Jember.

Darodjat, & Wahyudhiana. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Islamadina, xiv(1), 1–28.

Farida, K. (2017). Penerapan Evaluasi Model CIPP terhadap Hasil Belajar pada Program Pembelajaran FIqih Materi Zakat dan Hikmahnya di Kelas X Madrasah ALiyah Paradigma Palembang. UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.

Haryanto. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Universitas Negri Yogyakarta Press.

Irawan, S., & Prasetyo, D. (2020). The evaluation of online school examination implementation using CIPP model. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.33032

Jannah, H. (2017). Pengembangan Kurikulum (Teori dan Praktik). In Kurikulum 2013 (pp. 1–388). Pustaka Nurja.

Mieghem, V. A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2018). An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta review. International Juurnal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 675–689.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

Nasution. (2014). Asas-Asas Kurikulum. Bumi Aksara.

Purnomo, H., & Wulandari, I. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Evaluasi Pembelajaran untuk Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Kuningan. Jurnal PAJAR ( Pendidikand Dan Pengajaran), 3(6), 1204–1215.

Putra, P. O. (2020). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Tematik Menggunakan Model CIPP di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Mangunsari 01 Gunungpati Semarang. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rosyada, N. M., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Elementary school: A review of evaluation selementary school: A review of evaluations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1–9.

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–168.

Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360

Sudijono, A. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan . Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wahyuni Ningsih, S., Sakundarno Adi, M., & Dian Saraswati Peminatan Epidemiologi dan Penyakit Tropik Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, L. (2019). Systemic Review Metode Intervensi Pengetahuan Masyarakat dalam Pengendalian Kasus Leptospirosis di Wilayah Kota Semarang (Vol. 7, Issue 1). http://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkm

Warju. (2016). Innovation of Vocational Technology Education Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology EducationXII, XII(1), 36–42.

Yahya. Anandita, Risnawati, & Kurniawati, Y. (2021). Evaluasi Model CIPP Pelaksanaan Program Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Wustha di SMP Negeri I Rambah. Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Pendidikan, 13(2), 46–54.

Yeni, D. I., Wulandari, H., & Hadiati, E. (2020). Pelaksanaan Program Pemberian Makanan Sehat Anak Usia Dini : Studi Evaluasi Program CIPP. MURHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/DOI : 10.37985/murhum.v1i2.9