The Effect of Classcraft Gamification on Motivation and Academic Achievement In Primary Science Education

Ummiatul Fitri; Ranti Meizatri; Hana Shilfia Iraqi

doi:10.33578/pjr.v10i3.384

Authors

Ummiatul Fitri State University of Padang, Indonesia Author
Ranti Meizatri State University of Padang, Indonesia Author
Hana Shilfia Iraqi State University of Padang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v10i3.384

Keywords:

classcraft gamification, student motivation, academic achievement, digital learning

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted persistent declines in primary students’ science motivation and engagement in the post-pandemic and digital learning era, indicating a need for pedagogical approaches that are both motivating and cognitively meaningful. However, empirical evidence on structured gamification platforms that simultaneously enhance motivation and achievement in primary science remains limited. This study examined the influence of Classcraft gamification on learning motivation and academic achievement in primary science. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest–posttest control group design was employed, involving 60 fifth-grade students from an Indonesian primary school, equally assigned to an experimental group using Classcraft and a control group receiving conventional instruction. Data were collected using a Science Achievement Test (KR-20 = 0.83) and a Motivation Questionnaire (α = 0.89). Paired-sample t-tests, independent-sample t-tests, and ANCOVA were conducted to analyse group differences while controlling for pretest scores. The results demonstrated significant improvements in both achievement (from 60.13 to 85.20) and motivation (from 64.87 to 84.63) in the experimental group, with strong effect sizes (Cohen’s d > 1.70) and robust ANCOVA results (F = 60.35, p < 0.001; η² = 0.52). These findings suggest that Classcraft gamification effectively enhances motivation, collaboration, and conceptual understanding in primary science. Practically, teachers can utilize Classcraft’s role-playing and quest-based features to scaffold collaborative inquiry and sustain students’ engagement in science learning.

References

Alsadoon, E., Alkhawajah, A., & Bin, A. (2022). Heliyon Effects of a gami fi ed learning environment on students ’ achievement , motivations , and satisfaction. Heliyon, 8(8), e10249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10249

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (Vol. 1195). Houghton Mifflin Boston, MA.

Dean, C. B., & Hubbell, E. R. (2012). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Ascd.

Fitri, U., Amini, R., Zulkarnaini, A. P., & Media, A. (2025). the Use of Augmented Reality in Science Learning To Improve Motivation and Understanding of Science Concepts Among Elementary School Students. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(1), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4732

Fitria, Y., Fitri, U., & Oktarina, R. (2025). Scientific Literacy Achievement of Elementary School Students in STEM Learning Using E-Modules (Nomor Iceste). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-489-1

Gillies, R. M., & Baffour, B. (2017). representations and discourse on students ’ task inquiry-based science. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9414-4

Huang, Y.-T., & Wang, T.-H. (2025). Effect of integrating gamified teaching activities on learning emotions of design students with different learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(5), 3614–3634.

Ikhsan, T., & Chen, S. (2025). Gamification in collaborative learning : synthesizing evidence through meta ‑ analysis. In Journal of Computers in Education (Nomor 0123456789). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00349-4

Jirout, J. J. (2020). Supporting Early Scientific Thinking Through Curiosity. 11(August), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01717

Journal, B., & Dehghanzadeh, E. T. (n.d.). Using gamification to support learning in K- education : A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13335

Kaewmanee, T., Srisenpila, A., & Worapun, W. (2024). International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences grade 5 students ’ science process skills and achievement in friction. 11(12), 207–214.

Khan, A., & Ahmad, F. H. (2017). Use of digital game based learning and gamification in secondary school science : The effect on student engagement , learning and gender difference. 2767–2804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9622-1

Larner, A. J. (2014). Effect size (Cohen’s d) of cognitive screening instruments examined in pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 4(2), 236–241.

Lestari, I. (2025). GAMIFICATION LEARNING MENGGUNAKAN CLASSCRAFT PADA GOOGLE CLASSROOM UNTUK OPTIMALISASI MOTIVASI. 9(1), 54–64.

Li, K., & Moore, D. R. (2018). Motivating students in massive open online courses (MOOCs) using the attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction (ARCS) model. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2(2), 102–113.

Mas, W., Jayanti, M., Firdaus, M. Y., & Arochman, T. (2024). The effectiveness of integrating classcraft : A gamified learning platform on enhancing writing skills among elementary school learners. 5(2), 277–286.

Naaman, A., Narmin, S., Noori, M., & Ozdamli, F. (2022). Gamification Applications in E ‑ learning : A Literature Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x

Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Joaquim, S., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2022). The effects of personalized gamification on students ’ flow experience , motivation , and enjoyment. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x

Oraif, I. M. K. (2018). An investigation into the impact of the flipped classroom on intrinsic motivation (IM) and learning outcomes on an EFL writing course at a university in Saudi Arabia based on self-determination theory (SDT). University of Leicester.

Pujiastuti, E., & Susilo, B. E. (2021). Systematic literature review : pengaruh motivasi terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa 1). 12(2), 236–248.

Rutherford, A. (2011). ANOVA and ANCOVA: a GLM approach (Vol. 658). Wiley Online Library.

Saputra, M. D. (2022). GAMIFIKASI BERBASIS CLASSCRAFT SEBAGAI INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. 8(2), 852–863.

Sholihah, N., & Buhanuddin, H. (2025). Adaptasi Model Gamifikasi Classcraft untuk Pengembangan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam ( PAI ) pada Peserta Didik di Indonesia : Suatu Studi Konseptual. 3(5), 26–31.

Sunaryati, T., Rizqy, H. M., Rayyan, M. F., & Ratu, A. (2024). No Title. 5(4), 52–62.

Toshalis, B. E., & Nakkula, M. J. (n.d.). MOTIVATI ON , ENGAGEMENT , AND STUDENT VOICE EDITORS ’ INTRODUCTION TO.Toshalis, B. E., & Nakkula, M. J. (n.d.). MOTIVATI ON , ENGAGEMENT , AND STUDENT VOICE EDITORS ’ INTRODUCTION TO.

Triantafyllou, S. A., Georgiadis, C., & Sapounidis, T. (2025). Gamification in education and training: A literature review. International Review of Education, 1–35.

Zourmpakis, A., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023). Adaptive Gamification in Science Education : An Analysis of the Impact of Implementation and Adapted Game Elements on Students ’ Motivation.

Zourmpakis, A., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2024). The Effects of Adaptive Gamification in Science Learning : A Comparison with Traditional Inquiry-based Learning and genders Differences The Effects of Adaptive Gamification in Science Learning : A Comparison with Traditional Inquiry-Based Learning and genders Differences. 0–13. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202411.0766.v1