Comparative Analysis of the Effect Of Blended Learning Model Through Experimental Approach and Project on the Scientific Demeanor and Learning Outcomes

Fitri Wardani

doi:10.33578/pjr.v7i5.9626

Authors

Fitri Wardani Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1 Mondokan, Kabupaten Sragen, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i5.9626

Keywords:

blended learning, scientific demeanor, learning outcomes, experimental approach and project

Abstract

This paper analyzes differences in students’ learning outcomes in a blended learning model that uses experimental and project methods. In addition, this paper also investigates the effect of scientific demeanor on learning outcomes. The research method uses a simple random sampling technique in four classes at the Light Vehicle Engineering department. The research uses four variables, namely scientific demeanor, learning outcomes, physics learning that uses a blended learning model with experimental, and project methods. Scientific attitude is observed through observing participants' responses to specific situations while learning outcomes are measured through tests that are taken after a particular learning process. The research results indicate three main findings. First, there are significant differences in learning outcomes between students who are taught by using the blended learning model with the experimental method and the students who are taught with the project method. Second, there are substantial differences in learning outcomes based on students' scientific demeanor. Third, there is no significant effect between the blended learning model using experimental and project methods and students' demeanor toward learning outcomes. The research results contribute to the understanding of how different learning can influence students’ learning outcomes. In addition, the findings regarding the relationship between scientific demeanor and learning outcomes can also support efforts to develop more effective and adaptive learning strategies for various types of students.

References

Affandy, H. (2020). Integrasi nanoteknologi dalam pembelajaran di era Society 5.0: Kajian dari perspektif pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 10(2), 95–101.

Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2019a). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi fluida dinamis di SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 25–33.

Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2019b). The correlation of character education with critical thinking skills as an important attribute to success in the 21st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012132

Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2002). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. Prentice Hall.

APJII. (2017). Penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia 2017.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Aslan. (2017). Pumping teacher dalam tantangan pendidikan abad 21. Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(2), 89–100.

Belina, E., & Batubara, F. R. (2013). Perancangan dan implementasi aplikasi e-learning versi mobile berbasis Android. Singuda Ensikom, 4(3), 76–81.

Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian (Edisi ke-2). UNS Press.

Budiyono. (2017). Pengantar metodologi penelitian pendidikan. UPT UNS Press.

Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Chen, Y. T. (2022). The effects of web-based inquiry learning mode with the support of collaborative digital reading annotation system on information literacy instruction. Computers and Education, 179, 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104428

Clark, R. (2002). Six principles of effective e-learning: What works and why. The e-Learning Guild’s Learning Solutions E-Magazine.

Dalmeri. (2014). Pendidikan untuk pengembangan karakter: Telaah terhadap gagasan Thomas Lickona dalam Educating for Character. Jurnal Al-Ulum, 14(1), 269–288.

Derlina, Sabani, & Mihardi, S. (2015). Improved character and student learning outcomes through development of character education based general physics learning model. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 162–170.

Dewi, Y. K. (2015). Pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika: Math Didactic, 1(2), 117–124.

Dirgantoro, A. (2016). Peran pendidikan dalam membentuk karakter bangsa menghadapi era masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan PPKN, 2(1), 1–7.

Du, L., Zhao, L., Xu, T., Wang, Y., Zu, W., Huang, X., Nie, W., & Wang, L. (2022). Blended learning vs traditional teaching: The potential of a novel teaching strategy in nursing education – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103354

Elgohary, M., Palazzo, F. S., Breckwoldt, J., Cheng, A., & Pellegrino, J. (2022). Blended learning for accredited life support courses – A systematic review. Resuscitation Plus, 10, 100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100240

Graham, S. (2003). Instructional design for affective learning in theological education. British Journal of Theological Education, 14(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1558/jate.v14i1.58

Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effect of e-learning on students’ motivation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 423–430.

Hermawanto, Kusairi, S., & Wartono. (2013). Pengaruh blended learning terhadap penguasaan konsep dan penalaran fisika peserta didik kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 9(1), 67–76.

Husain, C. (2014). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran di SMA Muhammadiyah Tarakan. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 2(2), 184–192.

Hussa, E. A. (2018). Can I still eat it? Using problem-based learning to test the 5-second rule and promote scientific literacy. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(21), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny246

Iswari, R. D., & Utomo, S. W. (2017). Evaluasi penerapan program Adiwiyata untuk membentuk perilaku peduli lingkungan di kalangan siswa. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 15(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.15.1.35-41

Kusherawati, L., Windyariani, S., & Setiono, S. (2020). Profil sikap ilmiah siswa kelas VIII SMP melalui model guided inquiry laboratory experiment method (GILEM). Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2), 168–175.

Kusmana, A. (2011). E-learning dalam pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan, 14(1), 35–51.

Munir. (2017). Pembelajaran digital. Alfabeta.

Najib, A., & Achadiyah, B. N. (2015). Pengaruh pendidikan karakter terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 102–109.

Nugraheni, A. R. E., & Dina, D. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan pembelajaran e-learning terhadap kemandirian dan minat belajar mahasiswa. Edusains, 9(1), 111–116.

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-based learning with argumentation skills to improve students’ concept understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1).

Purwandari, Sunarno, W., & Cari. (2017). Pembelajaran fisika menggunakan inkuiri terbimbing dengan metode eksperimen dan proyek. Jurnal Inkuiri, 6(3), 77–86.

Raka, G. (2011). Pendidikan karakter di sekolah: Dari gagasan ke tindakan. Elex Media Komputindo.

Wardani, F., Suparmi, A., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Evaluating the e-learning on students’ character. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1).

Wahyudi. (2016). Analisis kontribusi sikap ilmiah, motivasi belajar, dan kemandirian belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 1(2), 20–31.

Wrahatnolo, T., & Munoto. (2018). 21st century skill implication on educational system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1).

Zufria, I. (2016). Pemanfaatan media digital (e-learning) dalam memaksimalkan proses belajar mengajar di perguruan tinggi. Nizhamiyah, 6(1), 76–103.