STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION TOWARDS ONLINE LEARNING DURING THE COVID19 PANDEMIC THROUGH END-USER COMPUTING SATISFACTION (EUCS)

Wahyuni; Siti Habsari Pratiwi

doi:10.33578/pjr.v5i2.8165

Authors

Wahyuni Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa, Kota Langsa, Indonesia Author
Siti Habsari Pratiwi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa, Kota Langsa, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i2.8165

Keywords:

satisfaction, online learning, end user computing satisfaction (EUCS)

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has brought significant changes to learning systems. Thus, it is highly important to evaluate the implementation of online learning. This study aimed to investigate students’ satisfaction with online learning through End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) proposed by Doll. There were five EUCS indicators utilized to determine the level of satisfaction, namely: content, accuracy, format, ease of use, and punctuality. EUCS instruments were adopted, modified, and tested for the validity of 12 items. This study involved 108 respondents consisting of students from four faculties at IAIN Langsa. Data were collected by using a google form questionnaire. The findings showed that the score for the indicator of the content of online learning was 67% (satisfied) while the score for the indicator of the accuracy of online learning was 54, 54% (quite satisfied). Moreover, the score of the indicator of the form of online learning was 56, 48% (quite satisfied), and the score of the indicator of the convenience of the access of online learning was 78, 79% (satisfied). At last, the score of the indicator of punctuality of online learning was 64, 26% (satisfied). This data showed that the highest score of students’ satisfaction was the convenience of the access of online learning while the lowest score of students’ satisfaction was the indicator of accuracy.

References

Daftar Pustaka

Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). Using the End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a website. *Decision Sciences, 36*(2), 341–364. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00076.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00076.x)

Alshehri, A., & O’Keefe, R. (2019). Analyzing social media to assess user satisfaction with Transport for London’s Oyster. *International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35*(15), 1378–1387. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1526442](https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1526442)

Dedić, N., & Stanier, C. (2017). Measuring the success of changes to business intelligence solutions to improve business intelligence reporting. *Journal of Management Analytics, 4*(2), 130–144. [https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2017.1299048](https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2017.1299048)

Deng, X., Doll, W. J., Al-Gahtani, S. S., Larsen, T. J., Pearson, J. M., & Raghunathan, T. S. (2008). A cross-cultural analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A multi-group invariance analysis. *Information & Management, 45*(4), 211–220. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.002)

Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. *MIS Quarterly, 12*(2), 259–274. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/248851](https://www.jstor.org/stable/248851)

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (2011). A confirmatory factor analysis of the EUCS instrument. *MIS Quarterly, 18*(4), 453–461.

Edirisinghe, S. D., & Roshantha, L. M. D. (2018). Statistical analysis on enterprise resource planning systems on end-user satisfaction. *IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20*(7), 24–34. [https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2007042434](https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2007042434)

Fitriantoro, M. J., & Husnah, N. (2018). The implementation of the End-User Computing Satisfaction model into SCeLE. *Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 55*, 151–155. [https://doi.org/10.2991/iac-17.2018.27](https://doi.org/10.2991/iac-17.2018.27)

Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. *Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10*(2), 169–207. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270](https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270)

Hendrickson, A. R., Glorfeld, K., & Cronan, T. P. (1994). On the repeated test–retest reliability of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. *Decision Sciences, 25*(4), 655–665. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01864.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01864.x)

Hou, C. K. (2018). Examining users’ intention to continue using business intelligence systems. *International Journal of Business and CRM, 8*(1), 49–70. [https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBCRM.2018.090593](https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBCRM.2018.090593)

Jury, M., Smeding, A., Stephens, N. M., Nelson, J. E., Aelenei, C., & Darnon, C. (2017). The experience of low-SES students in higher education. *Journal of Social Issues, 73*(1), 23–41. [https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12202](https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12202)

Kim, S., & McHaney, R. (2000). Validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in CASE tool environments. *Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41*(1), 49–52. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2000.11646975](https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2000.11646975)

Klenke, K. (1992). Construct measurement in management information systems. *INFOR, 30*(4), 325–348. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732206](https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732206)

Larsen, T. J. (2009). A multilevel explanation of end-user computing satisfaction with ERP systems. *Computers in Industry, 60*(9), 657–668. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.05.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.05.004)

Lawson-Body, A., Willoughby, L., Lawson-Body, L., & Logossah, K. (2017). Developing and validating a cultural user satisfaction instrument. *Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57*(4), 319–329. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1232977](https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1232977)

Marakarkandy, B., & Yajnik, N. (2013). Re-examining and empirically validating the EUCS model in internet banking. *International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31*(6), 440–455. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2013-0051](https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-06-2013-0051)

Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education. *Higher Education, 72*(4), 413–434. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x)

McHaney, R., Hightower, R., & Pearson, J. (2002). A validation of the EUCS instrument in Taiwan. *Information & Management, 39*(6), 503–511. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00119-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206%2801%2900119-7)

McHaney, R., Hightower, R., & White, D. (1999). EUCS test–retest reliability in decision support systems. *Information & Management, 36*(2), 109–119. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00010-5](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206%2899%2900010-5)

Norfazlina, G., Akma, A. S. S., Adrina, S. N., & Noorizan, M. M. (2016). Customer information system satisfaction and task productivity. *Procedia Economics and Finance, 37*, 7–12. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30085-5](https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671%2816%2930085-5)

Pikkarainen, K., Pikkarainen, T., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2006). Measurement of EUCS of online banking services. *International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24*(3), 158–172. [https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610659012](https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610659012)

Savoy, A., & Salvendy, G. (2016). Factors for customer information satisfaction. *International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32*(9), 695–707. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1190137](https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1190137)

Scott Rigby, C., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic–extrinsic dichotomy. *Motivation and Emotion, 16*(3), 165–185. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991650](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991650)

Sebetci, Ö. (2018). Enhancing end-user satisfaction through technology compatibility. *Health Policy and Technology, 7*(3), 265–274.

Somers, T., Nelson, K., & Karimi, J. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the EUCS instrument: Replication within an ERP domain. *Decision Sciences, 35*(1), 145. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2004.02437.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2004.02437.x)

Tjong, Y., Sugandi, L., Nurshafita, A., Magdalena, Y., Evelyn, C., & Yosieto, N. S. (2018). User satisfaction factors on learning management systems usage. *Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management and Technology*, 11–14. [https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528171](https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528171)

Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Doll, W. J. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance of the IT impact instrument. *Omega, 33*(2), 107–118. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega)