INNOVATION OF TRAINING DESIGN TO INCREASE WRITING SKILL OF SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES FOR PARTICULAR FUNCTIONAL CIVIL SERVANTS THROUGH THE “REVERSE THINKING” METHOD

Endan Suwandana

doi:10.33578/pjr.v4i2.7947

Authors

Endan Suwandana BPSDMD Provinsi Banten, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i2.7947

Keywords:

BPS training center, JFT, KTI training, learning method innovation, statistician, widyaiswara

Abstract

This study aims at creating, implementing dan examining a training design innovation, whether or not it can improve the ability of the trainees. The study was carried out using descriptive-quantitative approach. This study has successfully created a training design called the Reverse Thinking (RT) method. That training design was then applied to the Article Writing Training at the Education and Training Center of the Central Statistics Bureau, attended by widyaiswara and statisticians with a total of 95 participants divided into two batches. The RT method has proven to be very effective in improving the ability of trainees to write scientific articles, both in terms of cognitive, affective, and psychomotoric (practical) aspects. Some indicators were that almost 100% of the trainees successfully submitted their papers to scientific journals on the last day of the training, evenmore 28 articles finally being published. The cognitive abilities of the participants also improved, indicated by the increase of the post-test scores. In the affective aspect, all participants have stated that their motivation in writing articles increased, as shown by the concentrated value between 7 and 10, from the 1 – 10 Likert Scale. Those results proved that the RT method could effectively improve competence of the training participants, both teoritically and practically.

References

Al-Omrani, K. A. (2014). Designing an effective training process: A case study at Sohar Development Office, Sultanate of Oman (Disertasi doktoral). Graduate School of Government, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Ananta, H., Murnomo, A., Kartono, R., & Mulwinda, A. (2016). Pelatihan dan pendampingan penulisan artikel ilmiah untuk e-journal mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik Elektro FT UNNES. Rekayasa: Jurnal Penerapan Teknologi dan Pembelajaran, 14(2), 121–125.

Arden, P. (2006). Whatever you think, think the opposite. London: Portfolio.

Arta, K. S. (2018). Pelatihan penulisan artikel untuk publikasi di jurnal ilmiah untuk meningkatkan profesionalisme guru-guru di Kecamatan Kubutambahan Kabupaten Buleleng. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial ke-2 (hlm. 146–159).

Arthur, R. (2018). Evaluasi program diklat karya tulis ilmiah untuk widyaiswara Pusbangtendik Kemendikbud. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 35–48.

Batubara, H. H., & Ariani, D. N. (2016). Workshop penggunaan Google Form sebagai media evaluasi pembelajaran pada dosen-dosen Fakultas Studi Islam. Jurnal Al-Ikhlas, 2(1), 39–44.

Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people. New York: Free Press.

Elfindri, Rustad, S., Nizam, & Dahrulsyah. (2015). Lecturer performances in Indonesia higher education system. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 1(1), 26–36.

English Language & Usage. (2018, November 29). Origin of “I hear and I forget; I see and I remember; I do and I understand”. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/226886/origin-of-i-hear-and-i-forget-i-see-and-i-remember-i-do-and-i-understand

Farmer, R., Oakman, P., & Rice, P. (2016). A review of free online survey tools for undergraduate students. MSOR Connections, 15(1), 71–78.

Ginanjar, A. (2018). Peningkatan mutu karya tulis dosen FIS dengan menggunakan reference manager software Mendeley. Harmony: Jurnal Pembelajaran IPS dan PKN, 3(2), 199–203.

Gutiérrez, D. C., & Villegas, E. G. (2015). The importance of methodology in higher education: A critical look. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 377–382.

Hajjar, S. T. E. L., & Alkhanaizi, M. S. (2018). Exploring the factors that affect employee training effectiveness: A case study in Bahrain. SAGE Open, 1–12.

Hoogenboom, B. J., & Manske, R. C. (2012). How to write a scientific article. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(5), 512–517.

Indarti, S. (2012). Inovasi metode pembelajaran mata kuliah metode penelitian manajemen dengan metode konstruktivisme dalam rangka menurunkan durasi studi mahasiswa (Studi kasus Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau). Jurnal Ekonomi, 20(4), 1–18.

Jenkins, S. (1995). How to write a paper for a scientific journal. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 41(4), 285–289.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1–26.

Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 237–242.

Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychology, 44, 250–266.

Khales, B. (2016). The impact of a teacher training program on mathematics teaching methodologies: Using student-centered learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(14), 992–998.

Kremer, L., & Perlberg, A. (2006). Training of teachers in strategies that develop independent learning skills in their pupils. British Journal of Teacher Education, 5(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747790050104

Lim, D. H. (2000). Training design factors influencing transfer of training to the workplace within an international context. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 52(2), 243–258.

Madjid, S., Emzir, & Akhadiah, S. (2017). Improving academic writing skills through contextual teaching learning for students of Bosowa University Makassar. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 268–272.

Punia, B. K., & Kant, S. (2013). A review of factors affecting training effectiveness vis-à-vis managerial implications and future research directions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 151–164.

Rahmiati. (2015). Analisis kendala internal mahasiswa dalam menulis karya ilmiah. Al-Daula, 4(2), 327–343.

Redhana, I. W., Kirna, I. M., Suardana, I. N., & Subagia, I. W. (2016). Pelatihan penulisan artikel ilmiah bagi guru-guru kimia di Kabupaten Buleleng. Widya Laksana: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 20–33.

Rohaeni, N., & Jubaedah, Y. (2010). Model desain kurikulum pelatihan profesi guru vokasional berbasis technological curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11(2), 41–53.

Salamah, U., & Sumarsilah, S. (2018). Pembelajaran menulis karya ilmiah berbasis deep dialogue critical–creative thinking (DDCT). Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 90–101.

Slamet, J. (2016). Otak-atik Google Form guna pembuatan kuesioner kepuasan pemustaka. Info Persadha, 14(1), 21–35.

Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Velada, R., Caetano, A., Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Kavanagh, M. J. (2007). The effects of training design, individual characteristics, and work environment on transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(4), 282–294.

Wiryawan, K. G. (2014). The current status of science journals in Indonesia. Science Editing, 1(2), 71–75.

Wischgoll, A. (2017). Improving undergraduates’ and postgraduates’ academic writing skills with strategy training and feedback. Frontiers in Education, 2(33), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00033

Yaqoot, E. S. I., Noor, W. S. W. M., & Isa, M. F. M. (2017). Factors influencing training effectiveness: Evidence from public sector in Bahrain. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Economica, 13(2), 31–44.

Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Indonesia peringkat 2 publikasi ilmiah di ASEAN. https://risbang.ristekdikti.go.id/publikasi/beritamedia/salip-singapura-publikasi-ilmiah-indonesia-peringkat-2-asean/

Media Indonesia. (2018). Kualitas publikasi ilmiah peneliti Indonesia masih rendah. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/158754-kualitas-publikasi-ilmiah-peneliti-indonesia-masih-rendah