The Role of Teachers' Pedagogical Competence in Designing Deep Learning With Hots Assessment on Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary School

Authors

  • Endang Setiyowati Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Ari Metalin Ika Puspita Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
  • Neni Mariana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v10i4.1561

Keywords:

critical thinking skills, deep learning, elementary school, HOTS assessment, pedagogical competence

Abstract

This study seeks to describe the role of teachers' pedagogical competence in designing deep learning that integrates Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment on critical thinking skills of elementary students. The research uses an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach, with three teachers in grades 4, 5, and 6 at UPT SDN 232 Gresik as research subjects, and involved 78 students. Data collection was conducted through learning observations, in-depth interviews, analysis of Deep Learning Plan (RPM) documents, and HOTS assessments. The results reveal that teachers' pedagogical competence in designing deep learning was good, with variation across classes: Grade 4 and Grade 5 teachers demonstrated strong competence with consistent integration of HOTS, whereas the Grade 6 teacher indicated a significant gap between conceptual planning and classroom implementation. Teachers' ability to compile HOTS assessments also varied: the Grade 5 teacher produced the most balanced instrument, with 10 of 15 items at the C4-C6 level, while the Grade 6 teacher designed all 9 items at C4-C6 but with poor alignment between the teaching content and the assessment difficulty. Students' critical thinking skills showed significant variation across classes, with an overall average score of 75.72 (Good category): Grade 5 achieved the highest average of 86.86 (Very Good), Grade 4 achieved 75.74 (Good), and Grade 6 achieved the lowest at 64.58 (Adequate). This research recommends continuous training for teachers in designing authentic HOTS assessments and in ensuring alignment between lesson planning, classroom scaffolding, and assessment demands.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arikunto, S. (2019). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach (Revised Edition). Rineka Cipta.

Charles, C., Mastiah, M., & Peterianus, S. (2024). Analysis of critical thinking skills of fifth-grade elementary school students in mathematics learning. Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 138–147.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daga, A. T., Wahyudin, D., & Susilana, R. (2022). Implementation of teachers’ pedagogical competence in the 2013 curriculum learning process in elementary school. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 2(5), 900–909.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.

Febriana, R., Kuntarto, E., & Alirmansyah, A. (2020). Teachers’ ability to plan higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) instruction in elementary schools. Primary: Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education, 9(2), 153–166.

Fitriyah, L., Amin, S. M., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2020). Designing open-ended instruction to improve elementary school students’ critical thinking ability. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(8), 47–52.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin.

Harun, D., Hulukati, E. P., Hasan, A. M., & Ahmad, J. (2022). Profile of elementary school teachers' pedagogic competence in implementing science-based thematic learning and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(2), 217–222.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2025). Deep learning guide. Kemendikbudristek.

Mariana, N. (2017). Transforming mathematics problems in Indonesian primary schools by embedding Islamic and Indonesian contexts [Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University]. Murdoch University Research Repository.

Mariana, N., & Sasmita, F. E. (2024). Designed activities on developing mental strategies using an Alms value-based learning trajectory in elementary school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 859–882.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Patricia, D., & Elfitra, E. (2024). Development of a HOTS assessment instrument to measure critical thinking skills of junior high school students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 23–37.

Director General of Teacher and Education Personnel Regulation No. 2626/B/HK.04.01/2023 on Guidelines for the Management of Teacher and School Principal Performance.

Sa'diyah, H., Umalihayati, Hidayah, R., Salimi, M., Fajari, L. E. W., Mashudi, & Aini, S. (2024). The effect of the problem-based learning model on critical thinking skills in elementary school: A meta-analysis study. Iqra' Journal: Educational Studies, 9(1), 135–160.

Sarwanto, S., Fajari, L. E. W., & Chumdari, C. (2021). Critical thinking skills and their impacts on elementary school students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 133–161.

Yusella, Y., Suciptaningsih, O. A., & Degeng, M. D. K. (2023). Development of HOTS-based assessment in the curriculum to increase critical thinking skills of elementary school students. JIIP - Scientific Journal of Education, 6(7), 4991–4998.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)