SOCIAL MEDIA INTERDISCIPLINARY IN MULTIMODALITY OF INTERACTIVE ARTS AND CULTURE LEARNING FOR MILLENIALS

Yasinda Widya Fahmi; Djuli Djatiprambudi; Warih Handayaningrum

doi:10.33578/pjr.v5i1.8257

Authors

Yasinda Widya Fahmi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
Djuli Djatiprambudi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author
Warih Handayaningrum Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v5i1.8257

Keywords:

interdisciplinary, social media, multimodality, interactive art and culture learning, millenials

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the problems in learning interactive art and culture at Junior High School level which was categorized as the millennial generation. The focus of this study laid in the interdisciplinary aspect of social media in multimodality of learning arts and culture. In order to reveal the opportunities and challenges of the use of social media in its development as a medium in interactive art and culture learning, as well as the students’ responses about it, this study used qualitative-analytic method. Data were obtained from observation conducted from January to June 2020 at junior high schools in Surabaya, East Java. The results showed that the learning involvement experienced by students had complexity and multimodality, including collaborative work, observing, and evaluating each other's work, and involvement in finding, identifying, and exploring trends related to delivery in social media as a medium for art and culture learning. This implied that this learning involvement was able to motivate students to be more actively involved in learning with a sense of joy; positioning artwork with others on social media; increasing the contextual and conceptual understanding in the learning materials and applying it as a process of actualizing aesthetic skills; and improving critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

References

Akcaoglu, M., & Bowman, N. D. (2016). Using instructor-led Facebook groups to enhance students’ perceptions of course content. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.029

Albers, P. (2006). Imagining the possibilities in multimodal curriculum design. English Education, 38(2), 75–101.

Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2014). Research-based character education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260082

Blankenship, M. (2011). How social media can and should impact higher education. Education Digest, 76(7), 39–42.

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

Bourelle, T., Bourelle, A., & Rankins-Robertson, S. (2015). Teaching with instructional assistants: Enhancing student learning in online classes. Computers and Composition, 37, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.007

Bown, O., & Ferguson, S. (2018). Understanding media multiplicities. Entertainment Computing, 25, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.11.001

Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11284

Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2014). The Internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12007

Choi, H., & Piro, J. M. (2009). Expanding arts education in a digital age. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.3.27-34

Colman, A. (2005). Net.art and net.pedagogy: Introducing Internet art to the digital art curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 46(Technology Issue), 61–73.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_2

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

Dussel, I., & Priem, K. (2017). The visual in histories of education: A reappraisal. Paedagogica Historica, 53(6), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1392582

Fachrurrofi. (2019). Tradisi Babanyo di Kabupaten Bandung Barat untuk bahan pembelajaran di SMA. Lokabasa: Journal of Language Studies, Literature, and Culture, 10(1), 108–116.

Frois, J. P. (2010). Lacan in art education. Visual Arts Research, 36(2), 1–14.

Gao, S., & Wang, C. M. (2019). Crisis of the human and the responsibilities of art/education. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 20(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2019.1577586

Gehlbach, R. D. (1990). Art education: Issues in curriculum and research. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019007019

Gomis-Porqueras, P., & Rodrigues-Neto, J. A. (2018). Teaching technologies, attendance, learning and the optimal level of access to online materials. Economic Modelling, 73, 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.009

Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in online information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163

Grossman, J. (2017). Adaptation in visual culture. Palgrave Macmillan.

Sugiarta, A. N. (2007). Pengembangan model pengelolaan program pembelajaran kolaboratif untuk kemandirian anak jalanan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Syahid, A. (2003). Pengembangan bahan ajar matakuliah rancangan pembelajaran dengan menerapkan model elaborasi. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2008). Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 1–5.

Tusiime, W. E., Johannesen, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2020). Teaching art and design in a digital age: Challenges facing Ugandan teacher educators. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1786439

Ulusman, L., & Bayburtlu, C. (2012). Paradigm for art education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.160

Utami, V. M., & Nugraheni, T. (2019). Penerapan model Treffinger berbasis lingkungan dalam pembelajaran seni tari. Gondang: Jurnal Seni dan Budaya, 3(2), 79–85.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. University of Western Ontario.

Van Manen, M. (1995). On the epistemology of reflective practice. Teachers and Teaching, 1(1), 35–50.

Willis, J. (2007). The neuroscience of joyful education. Educational Leadership, 64, 1–4.

Xia, X. (2020). Learning behavior mining and decision recommendation in interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799028