INTER-STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE POLITENESS OF SMP NEGERI 2 KELAYANG INDRAGIRI HULU

Titi Yustia Siregar; Mangatur Sinaga; Charlina

doi:10.33578/pjr.v7i1.9108

Authors

Titi Yustia Siregar Riau University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia Author
Mangatur Sinaga Riau University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia Author
Charlina Riau University, Pekanbaru, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i1.9108

Keywords:

language politeness, inter-students’ speech, violation and obedience

Abstract

This paper describes and analyzes the language politeness among students of SMP Negeri 2 Kelayang Kelayang District in Indragiri Hulu Regency. It is qualitative research using an analytical descriptive method, namely analyzing and exposing data found in the form of words. Data analysis techniques begin with data reduction, presentation, and making conclusions and verification of the data. The data collection techniques carried out are recording, listening, and taking notes techniques. The source of the research data is inter-student speech. Based on the research results, it was found that the forms of language politeness compliance were the obedience of the maxim of wisdom, the obedience of the generosity maxim, the obedience of the praise maxim, the obedience of the humility maxim, the obedience of the agreement maxim, and the obedience of sympathy maxim. In addition to the obedience of language politeness, violations of language politeness were also found, namely violations of the maxim of wisdom, violations of the generosity maxim, violations of the praise maxim, violations of the humility maxim, violations of the agreement maxim, and violations of the sympathy maxim. The dominant maxim is the violation of the maxim of praise. In addition to the violation of the praise maxim, a dominant maxim refers to obedience to the generosity maxim.

References

Asmaulhusna. (2018) Respon Wali Murid Terhadap Peran Muhammadiyah Dalam Mengembangkan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Sd Muhaammadiahah 3 Kelurahan Tangkerang Barat, Kecamantan Marpoyan Damai Kota Pekanbaru). JOM FISIP, 5(1), 1-14. ISSN: 2355-6919

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Charlina, & Mangatur, S. (2007). Pragmatis. Pekanbaru: Cendikia Insan.

Fitri, A., & Astri, W. A. (2017). SEMANTIK Konsep dan Analisis. Jember: Madani.

Jauhari, A. (2017). Realisasi Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Indonesia Kelas XI SMK. Jurnal Lingtera, 4(2), 113-121. DOI: 10.21831/lt.v4i2.10056

Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Mustofa, M. B., dkk; (2021) Komunikasi Verbal Dan Nonverbal Pustakawan. Jurnal Prodi Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 12(1), 22-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/2397

Nurzakiah., Charlina dan Nursal, H. (2020). Kesantunan Berbahasa Antarsiswa di SMA Negeri 5 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Tuah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa, 2(2), 138-144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jtuah.2.2.p.138-144

Prasanti, D., dan Indriani, S. S. (2017). Social Interaction Of Membership Let's Hijrah Community In Line Social Media. Jurnal The Messenger, 9 (2), 143-152. E-ISSN: 2527-2810

Rumadi, H., & Syafrial. (2019). Maksim-maksim Kesantunan Berbahasa Tokoh dalam Novel Megat Karya Rida K Liamsi. Journal Of Languange, Literature, and Teaching, 1(3), 56-61. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v1i3.50-63

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wulandari, D., dkk; (2021) Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Transaksi Jual Beli di Pasar Wisata Inis sebagai Materi Ajar Pembelajaran Teks Negosiasi di SMA. Repetisi: Riset Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 98-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/repetisi.v4i1.1896

Yusri. (2016). Ilmu Pragmatik dalam Perspektif Kesopanan Berbahasa. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.