IMPROVING STUDENTS ABILITY ON ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSE (ESP) COURSE THROUGH STAR 7 JUMPS MODEL AT COACH STUDY PROGRAM FKIP- UNRI

Authors

  • Erni Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i1.7920

Keywords:

improving, STAR Model, ESP course

Abstract

This classroom action research design was aimed at analysing students’ failure in learning ESP (English for Specific Purposes) and finding out its solution. The purpose of this study was to improve the ability of Coach Study Program students of FKIP UNRI in learning ESP through the STAR 7 Jumps model and to find out factors that contribute more to the improvement. A total of 36 students, consisting of 27 boys and 9 girls, were involved as the participants of the study. This research was done in two cycles. Designing syllabus, evaluating teaching materials, and compiling teaching materials were also the procedures done in each cycle (planning, action, observation, and reflection). Semi-structured observation sheets and field notes were used to identify how the lecturer taught and how the learners learned, and an ESP achievement test was employed to identify students’ ability. The lecturer applied the seven steps of STAR well, which made the students more active, motivated, and interested in learning ESP. Students’ ability in learning ESP also improved, where the mean pre-test was 67, mean post-test cycle 1 was 73, and mean post-test cycle 2 was 76. The most dominant factor that caused the improvement was the teaching materials about the match sports topic, by which most students were active in problem identification, brainstorming, analyzing and formulating problems, self-study, and presentation.

References

Callison, D. (2015). The evolution of inquiry: Controlled, guided, modelled, and free. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

DIKTI. (2012). Active learning for higher education. Jakarta: DIKTI.

Erni, E., & Yamat, H. (2014). The implementation of a progressive approach PBL model to improve students reading comprehension at English Study Program FKIP–UR. E-Journal UNP, 2, 126–136.

Ernie, & Stringer, E. (2008). Action research in education (2nd ed.). England: Pearson Education.

Evans-Tony, D., & John, M. J. (2012). Development in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach (15th printing). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

FKIP UNRI. (2014). Kurikulum 2014. Pekanbaru: FKIP UNRI.

Foyewa, R. A. (2015). English: The international language of science and technology. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(5), 34–41.

Holzer, S. M., & Andruet, R. H. (2000). Active learning in the classroom. Proceedings, ASEE Southeastern Section Annual Meeting, 4, 2–4.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (2010). ESP: A learning-centered approach (25th printing). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jeffrey, F., & Nancy, S. (2008). Student-centered learning: Addressing faculty questions about student-centered learning. Curriculum, Labor, and Improvement Conference, 30(11), 1–11.

Kaminskiene, L., & Kavaliauskiene, G. (2014). Attitudes to improving speaking skills by guided individual activities. Santalka: Filologija, Edukologija, 22(1), 39–48.

Kavaliauskiene, G. (2005). Task-based learning outcomes in the ESP classroom. Kalbu studijos Journal in Central and Eastern European Library, 7, 66–70.

Mazuardi, Salamuddin, N., & Harun, M. T. (2017). Pengaruh faktor personal, interpersonal dan lingkungan terhadap penglibatan aktifitas fizik sekolah menengah atas Pekanbaru. Jurnal Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah, 4(2), 44–51.

Mazuardi. (2017). Pengaruh faktor personal, interpersonal dan lingkungan terhadap penglibatan aktifitas fizik sekolah menengah atas Pekanbaru (Disertasi). UKM, Malaysia.

Nunan, D. (1989). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Priyatmojo, A., dkk. (2010). Buku panduan pelaksanaan Student Centered Learning (SCL) dan Student Teacher Aesthetic Role-Sharing (STAR). Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan UGM Press.

Sample, A. (2000). Learning theories and their influence on the development and use of educational technologies. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 46(3).

Stringer, E. (2008). Action research in education (2nd ed., New International Edition). London: Pearson.

Valle, B. A. (2019). ESP: Today. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 7(2), 123–303.

Valle, B. A., et al. (2007). ESP: Studies for classroom development and implementation. UCA: Universidad de Cadiz, Primera Edición.

C. Sukotjo, K., Thammasitboon, H., & Howell, H. (2008). Students' perceptions of prosthodontics in a PBL hybrid curriculum. Journal of Prosthodontists, 17(5), 431–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00323.x

Woolfolk, A. (1998). Educational psychology (6th ed.).

Published

2020-01-30

Issue

Section

Original research

Most read articles by the same author(s)